Why Replacement Tyre Demand Is Holding Up Better Than OE

Introduction

Replacement tyre demand is not booming in 2026. But against weaker new-vehicle tyre demand, it is proving more resilient, while some of the strongest performance is concentrated in particular regions and higher-value sizes. Data from Michelin, Pirelli and Continental suggests that headline unit growth increasingly tells only part of the industry story.

Main Article

The gap between original equipment and replacement tyre demand has become one of the clearer features of the 2026 passenger car and light truck market.

Michelin's latest market estimates show cumulative global PC/LT original equipment demand declining through August, with weakness particularly evident in China and smaller falls in Europe and North America. Replacement sell-in, by contrast, was slightly higher overall. China was growing strongly, Europe was broadly stable and North America remained negative as surplus stocks of Asian tyres accumulated during the first half of 2025 continued to unwind.

Pirelli's data paints a similarly uneven picture, although not an identical one. Its July Market Watch put global OE car tyre demand at 3% below the previous year on a year-to-date basis, compared with a 1% decline in replacement. China replacement was up 4%, while European replacement demand overall was down 1%. Within that European figure, however, replacement tyres measuring at least 18 inches were up 14%.

That distinction matters. Replacement is proving more resilient than OE, but the data does not support describing the market as broadly buoyant.

Replacement Cycles Are Starting at Different Speeds

Part of the divergence follows from the basic difference between the two channels. OE tyre demand depends heavily on current vehicle production. Replacement demand is tied to vehicles already on the road, their use and the point at which tyres fitted in previous years reach replacement.

China offers the clearest current example.

Pirelli attributes the country's 4% year-to-date replacement growth partly to the early stages of the replacement cycle for electric vehicles sold during recent years. Michelin similarly identifies the replacement effect from large numbers of new vehicles delivered previously as a contributor to China's strong cumulative replacement market.

At the same time, China's OE market has weakened. Pirelli reported it 6% lower year to date through July, linking the decline principally to weaker domestic demand following reduced government incentives for local EV sales. Michelin also identifies less favourable vehicle-purchase incentives as a factor behind weaker Chinese OE tyre demand.

Replacement demand can therefore benefit from vehicles sold during an earlier expansion even while current vehicle production and OE requirements soften.

But this is not a uniform global effect. North America demonstrates why.

Michelin says the region's replacement decline through August still reflected progressive destocking of excess Asian tyre inventories built during the first half of 2025. Its sell-in numbers therefore capture not only underlying tyre consumption but movements in the distribution pipeline.

That is an important limitation when reading market data. A tyre manufacturer's shipments to distributors can move differently from tyres actually being fitted to vehicles.

The More Valuable Part of the Market Can Move Differently

The second feature of 2026 is the growing separation between aggregate units and the economic value of those units.

Pirelli's European figures are particularly stark. Overall replacement demand was down 1% year to date through July, but the 18-inch-and-above segment was up 14%. Pirelli says higher EV penetration is supporting that larger-rim market and describes High Value demand as continuing to outperform Standard tyres.

Its financial results reinforce the distinction. Pirelli's overall volumes were flat in the first half, yet its price/mix contribution was positive at 2.5%. High Value revenue increased 2% to €2.86 billion, while Standard revenue fell 8.6% to €635 million.

Michelin presents another version of the same pattern. Group tyre volumes generated a negative 0.9% effect in the first half, reflecting declines in OE and Tier 3 brands, but Michelin-brand replacement volumes increased 5%. A better product mix contributed to a positive price-mix effect, while Michelin had already reported that 18-inch-and-larger tyres represented 69% of Michelin-brand passenger car and light truck sales in the first quarter.

Continental provides perhaps the clearest indication of why mix can matter financially.

Its Tires business generated second-quarter sales of €3.3 billion, broadly unchanged year on year, while the adjusted EBIT margin increased from 12.1% to 15.3%. Continental identified the higher share of tyres measuring 18 inches and above as one of the principal contributors, alongside favourable raw-material effects and lower exchange-rate and tariff impacts.

That does not mean larger replacement tyres alone caused Continental's profitability improvement. The company does not isolate their contribution by channel, and several other factors were at work. It does show, however, why flat or modest tyre volumes can coexist with materially different financial outcomes.

There Is No Single Replacement Market

Regional data also cautions against treating replacement resilience as one global trend.

Continental said the European PC/LT replacement market increased 3% in the second quarter, driven by imports, while North America declined 1%. Michelin describes European replacement sell-in as broadly stable cumulatively through August despite fluctuations in imports, while Pirelli recorded European replacement 1% lower through July.

Those figures cover different periods and methodologies, so they should not be read as directly comparable market measurements. Instead, their differences illustrate the importance of timing, inventory and import flows when assessing supposedly straightforward volume trends.

For manufacturers, distributors and retailers, the more useful question may increasingly be not simply whether the tyre market is growing, but where demand is being generated and what type of tyre sits behind the headline number.

The evidence so far in 2026 points to three separate forces: weaker vehicle production suppressing parts of the OE market, replacement cycles supporting demand in parts of the installed vehicle parc, and premium or larger-diameter tyres performing differently from the wider market.

None of that establishes that manufacturers are collectively moving away from OE or deliberately becoming more dependent on replacement. Nor does replacement resilience guarantee higher manufacturer volumes or margins.

It does suggest a more demanding test for 2027. If aggregate tyre demand remains subdued, performance may depend increasingly on the quality, mix and geography of the demand available, rather than unit growth alone.

‍

‍

Tags: replacement tyre demand, original equipment tyres, tyre market 2026, Michelin tyre market, Pirelli tyre market, Continental Tires, tyre replacement market, 18-inch tyres, High Value tyres, tyre market analysis

‍